C++ has a special keyword to declare a function with C
bindings: extern "C"
. A function declared
as extern "C"
uses the function name as
symbol name, just as a C function. For that reason, only
non-member functions can be declared as extern
"C"
, and they cannot be overloaded.
Although there are severe limitations, extern
"C"
functions are very useful because they can be
dynamically loaded using dlopen
just like
a C function.
This does not mean that functions
qualified as extern "C"
cannot contain C++
code. Such a function is a full-featured C++ function which
can use C++ features and take any type of argument.
In C++ functions are loaded just like in C, with
dlsym
. The functions you want to load
must be qualified as extern "C"
to avoid
the symbol name being mangled.
Example 1. Loading a Function
main.cpp:
#include <iostream> #include <dlfcn.h> int main() { using std::cout; using std::cerr; cout << "C++ dlopen demo\n\n"; // open the library cout << "Opening hello.so...\n"; void* handle = dlopen("./hello.so", RTLD_LAZY); if (!handle) { cerr << "Cannot open library: " << dlerror() << '\n'; return 1; } // load the symbol cout << "Loading symbol hello...\n"; typedef void (*hello_t)(); // reset errors dlerror(); hello_t hello = (hello_t) dlsym(handle, "hello"); const char *dlsym_error = dlerror(); if (dlsym_error) { cerr << "Cannot load symbol 'hello': " << dlsym_error << '\n'; dlclose(handle); return 1; } // use it to do the calculation cout << "Calling hello...\n"; hello(); // close the library cout << "Closing library...\n"; dlclose(handle); }
hello.cpp:
#include <iostream> extern "C" void hello() { std::cout << "hello" << '\n'; }
The function hello
is defined in
hello.cpp
as extern
"C"
; it is loaded in main.cpp
with the dlsym
call. The function must be
qualified as extern "C"
because otherwise
we wouldn't know its symbol name.
There are two different forms of the
extern "C"
declaration: extern
"C"
as used above, and extern "C" {
… }
with the declarations between the
braces. The first (inline) form is a declaration with extern
linkage and with C language linkage; the second only affects
language linkage. The following two declarations are thus
equivalent:
extern "C" int foo; extern "C" void bar();
and
extern "C" { extern int foo; extern void bar(); }
As there is no difference between an
extern
and a
non-extern
function
declaration, this is no problem as long as you are not
declaring any variables. If you declare
variables, keep in mind that
extern "C" int foo;
and
extern "C" { int foo; }
are not the same thing.
For further clarifications, refer to [ISO14882], 7.5, with special attention to paragraph 7, or to [STR2000], paragraph 9.2.4.
Before doing fancy things with extern variables, peruse the documents listed in the see also section.
Loading classes is a bit more difficult because we need an instance of a class, not just a pointer to a function.
We cannot create the instance of the class using
new
because the class is not defined in the
executable, and because (under some circumstances) we don't
even know its name.
The solution is achieved through polymorphism. We define a base, interface class with virtual members in the executable, and a derived, implementation class in the module. Generally the interface class is abstract (a class is abstract if it has pure virtual functions).
As dynamic loading of classes is generally used for plug-ins — which must expose a clearly defined interface — we would have had to define an interface and derived implementation classes anyway.
Next, while still in the module, we define two additional helper
functions, known as class factory
functions. One of these functions creates an instance of
the class and returns a pointer to it. The other function takes a
pointer to a class created by the factory and destroys
it. These two functions are qualified as extern
"C"
.
To use the class from the module, load the two factory
functions using dlsym
just as we loaded the hello
function; then, we can create and destroy as many
instances as we wish.
Example 2. Loading a Class
Here we use a generic polygon
class as interface and the derived class
triangle
as implementation.
main.cpp:
#include "polygon.hpp" #include <iostream> #include <dlfcn.h> int main() { using std::cout; using std::cerr; // load the triangle library void* triangle = dlopen("./triangle.so", RTLD_LAZY); if (!triangle) { cerr << "Cannot load library: " << dlerror() << '\n'; return 1; } // reset errors dlerror(); // load the symbols create_t* create_triangle = (create_t*) dlsym(triangle, "create"); const char* dlsym_error = dlerror(); if (dlsym_error) { cerr << "Cannot load symbol create: " << dlsym_error << '\n'; return 1; } destroy_t* destroy_triangle = (destroy_t*) dlsym(triangle, "destroy"); dlsym_error = dlerror(); if (dlsym_error) { cerr << "Cannot load symbol destroy: " << dlsym_error << '\n'; return 1; } // create an instance of the class polygon* poly = create_triangle(); // use the class poly->set_side_length(7); cout << "The area is: " << poly->area() << '\n'; // destroy the class destroy_triangle(poly); // unload the triangle library dlclose(triangle); }
polygon.hpp:
#ifndef POLYGON_HPP #define POLYGON_HPP class polygon { protected: double side_length_; public: polygon() : side_length_(0) {} virtual ~polygon() {} void set_side_length(double side_length) { side_length_ = side_length; } virtual double area() const = 0; }; // the types of the class factories typedef polygon* create_t(); typedef void destroy_t(polygon*); #endif
triangle.cpp:
#include "polygon.hpp" #include <cmath> class triangle : public polygon { public: virtual double area() const { return side_length_ * side_length_ * sqrt(3) / 2; } }; // the class factories extern "C" polygon* create() { return new triangle; } extern "C" void destroy(polygon* p) { delete p; }
There are a few things to note when loading classes:
You must provide both a creation
and a destruction function; you must
not destroy the instances using
delete
from inside the executable, but
always pass it back to the module. This is due to the fact
that in C++ the operators new
and
delete
may be overloaded; this would
cause a non-matching new
and
delete
to be called, which could cause
anything from nothing to memory leaks and segmentation
faults. The same is true if different standard libraries
are used to link the module and the executable.
The destructor of the interface class should be virtual in any case. There might be very rare cases where that would not be necessary, but it is not worth the risk, because the additional overhead can generally be ignored.
If your base class needs no destructor, define an
empty (and virtual
) one anyway;
otherwise you will have problems
sooner or later; I can guarantee you that. You can read
more about this problem in the comp.lang.c++ FAQ at http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/, in
section 20.